It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
What's the deal with the role of arbitrators and the constitution? How are they related?
Will it work like American law where some kind of a supreme council of arbitrators can create precedent that evolves the EOS constitution?
From my perspective I've always views Marbury v Madison as the original sin of the American Republic since it makes it too easy for Congress to side step complicated political problems.
Ideally the token holders would retain the ability to amend and interpret the constitution. However I would imagine that there will be many cases where various arbitrators would have multiple interpretation of the constitution.
How we will reconcile the various decisions of the arbitrators with the rigidity of the constitution?