It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
It has been presented that we may have a bit (understatement) of an issue from BP's wanting security fix funds in the NOW without the WPS really being in place. MVP1 is apparently the way to get something out of the door to use now to prevent BP's from grabbing funds to fix issues without proper authority. Whether this would happen or not isn't the debate here. What were here to discuss is the issue of how the oversight on creation of MVP1 should work, and what process MVP1 oversight should go through to come to consensus about the Minimum Viable Product.
I will be attaching a process / mind-map here. This is obviously a rough draft as there is no hard material I am aware of that already exists. I'm open to making changes. I will offer the XMind (software) file so that the map can be modified directly. The software is free on trial if someone wants to just do a few quick edits or make new sub-topics.