cryptolions
About
- Username
- cryptolions
- Joined
- Visits
- 64
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
- Points
- 11
Comments
-
Correction: If TB >= 1, consider the following as a Max TPS candidate RB/TB It should be just RB. Not RB/TB. In simple terms: If the block lasts longer than a second, consider that block's rate all by itself as a maximum.
-
Assumption #2 and dealing with non-standard block times
-
Rate vs Actual That's what we were showing originally actually — the Max RATE. So if a half-second block had 9000 tx. The rate would be 18000. But then we thought it'd be better to list the actual TPS. Not rates which have been achieved…
-
So basically -- I suggested replacing the vague and idealistic "no lying" with a rigorous definition of 1) truth, and 2) when the rules of truth apply. I think that's the only way to do it -- clearly distinguish the rules of truth, and when those…
-
@dverchere said: A prohibition against lying and the protection of free speech can't coexist. Eventually someone gets burned at the stake for heresy. Don't use hyperbole to defend fraud. It isn't as simple as you indicate. Laws against…
-
To use the earlier example let's say I lie about my belief that bitcoin will collapse because it didn't. Then my reputation will suffer because my belief was proven to be wrong. There are many such concerns. I think they are resolved…
-
Great idea. Would love to see a revival of discussion of a BP constitution. It can also happen post-launch, absent the initiative of Block.one. Some influential BPs can subject themselves to a constitution (wholly or partly), and if voters favo…
-
* Life, Liberty and Property. Though it is rarely expressed in these terms, society today is trying to decide whether "property" extends to behavioral norms. Can behavioral norms be described as a commons (and thus defended)? * Lessig's ar…
-
My two satoshis for your consideration. Forgive me if this reads as rambling nonsense: Beginning with truth perfectly serves the larger mission of EOS -- the securing of life, liberty and property. Consider what @thomasbcox has said in interv…
-
Nevermind. I just saw that you commented here: Basically, you leave it up to the community and remind us that we have multiple mechanisms of enforcement.
-
How about ownership schemes as a means of working around the restriction on vote buying? (My earlier post here: https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/364/paying-for-votes.) This may be a non issue -- you've shown us some back of the napkin calculat…
-
Thank you for the comment, though the article doesn't precisely address our concerns. Let me emphasize that Crypto Lions will not go against what seems to be the dominant sentiment -- especially since it came from Dan Larimer and Thomas Cox. A b…
-
There's a discussion we're tracking in the BP telegram channel (https://t.me/EOSPros) about blocking self-voting. If we can effectively do that, then blocking profit sharing with votes makes sense. They go together. If you allow self-voting, …
-
In other words, you can argue that open revenue sharing levels the playing field, allowing BPs to succeed without partnering with any whales.